Browsing by Author "Ulicka, Danuta"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Item
    Bachtin i wokół Bachtina. Wprowadzenie do kalendarium
    (Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2008) Ulicka, Danuta
    "An introduction to a chronology" considers the probable reasons of the absence in Poland of a monograph of the "life and work of Mikhail Bakhtin" type and also undertakes the complex questions of constructing a chronology (calendar) of his "work and days". It indicates the area of facts and reports which are possible to account for, the inconvenience of introducing them, the necessity of making reductions and cuts. But through this it signals this wider context in which are contained Bakhtin's studies as well as those of the most important members of his circles. Thus in this work is undertaken the (so topical until recently) theoretical problem of the borders of the context which is so indispensable for understanding the text.
  • Item
    Czy jest możliwa inna historia teorii (literatury)?
    (Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2007) Ulicka, Danuta
    This article binds several problems in which literature specialists are interested: in reference to the famous disputes about the theory of literature it indicates the need to redefine it, proposes is conceptualisation as a cultural opinion (utterance), justifies this need by the analysis of historical factual realisations of "theory" and conditions which reduced (monologised) them, and finally - it refers to the question of actuality of the "post-modern breakthrough" and the "turns" which announce it. The documentation of the proposed theses which revise the existing interpretations of history of the theory is being searched in the Central and East European literary studies of the beginning and the first decades of the 20th century, which has always been considered as the founding one for the discipline, however, sińce recently also as the source one for the analysis of the status of the utterances (opinions) expressed in it. The question asked in the title of this article about the possibility of another history of the theory resolves just in reference to the previous, nowadays mechanically enlivened projects of theory.
  • Item
    Kalendarium
    (Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2008) Ulicka, Danuta
    The listing of the dates of life and work of Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin and of the leading members of his philosophical-literary clubs has been compiled based on the available data, sometimes still uncertain ones. Admittedly, a list of dry facts will not replace a monograph which does not exist in Poland, however, it allows at least to order the most important facts, biographical and editorial facts around which a lot of misunderstanding, conjectures and false convictions have grown. Like each such chronology it is selective and in agreement with the author's cognition of the whole and its interpretation. However, it does not impose them, leaving to the readers the liberty of creating their own narrations. As opposed to similar English and Russian chronologies (calendars), it introduces figures who are considered to be of second-rate (Nikolai Bakhtin, Konstantin Vaginov, Boris Zubakin, Mikhail Tubiansky) - probably only due to the fact that their works are still less known than those of the main heroes. Meanwhile it is they who give the idea about the impetus and variety of this strange unofficial and antiofficial institution which were Bakhtin's circles.
  • Item
    Narracyjna i nienarracyjna koncepcja dyskursu literaturoznawczego
    (Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2004) Ulicka, Danuta
    The article addresses questions of the relation between literary and literary science discourse which have been intensively discussed in poststructuralist reflection. As the author argues, their separation, accepted until the half of the century, in fact took place on the basis of pragmatic criteria (strongly connected with institutional division of work in the field of literary sciences), and not of a statement's formal characteristics or reference. What created the effect of stylistic, generic and compositional distinctness of speech genres inherent to literary science was only the prototype of literary science discourse shaped in result of their application and frequently confirmed in normative approaches, where it was formulated in terms of the categories of "truth" obliging science, as opposed to "fiction" distinguishing literature. Yet ineffaceable differences between literature and literary science are related to non-fictional and principally monosubjective characteristics of the discourse of the latter. Hence, in opposition to currently dominating narrativist interpretations, they can be by no means identified with respect to the "narrativeness" recognizable in both cases. While discussing these approaches on the basis of three chosen Polish works belonging to historioliterary prose, the author proposes to treat literary science discourse in categories applied to the description of a dramatic statement. For, what seems to be of paramount importance both in modernist and postmodernist phase, is the question of the author's subject's position and attitude towards the object of the statement and the relevant modalization of speech. A detailed analysis of their historical changeability remains, however, beyond the scope of the presented considerations.
  • Item
    „Zaprawić naukę humorem…”
    (Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2014) Ulicka, Danuta