Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/13293
Title: Dylemat wolność – bezpieczeństwo albo o pożytkach z instytucji czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych
Other Titles: A freedom – security dilemma or on benefits of an institution of initial investigation
Authors: Mazur, Paweł
Keywords: crime
lawmaker
political community
ethics of responsibility
legal institution
safety
freedom
dilemma
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM
Citation: Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2014 Tom 3, Nr 1, s. 192-208.
Abstract: The purpose of this article is to show a strong tension between two important values, namely freedom and security. A lawmaker has to choose a limitation of freedom to achieve security, which is very difficult. Legislator has to face with the dilemma in time of an institutional transformation. That time usually brings a radical growth of criminality. In such circumstances citizens demand from the legislator an effective fight with this serious threat. A lawmaker has to enable citizens both security and freedom by various legal institutions for example initial investigation. The initial investigation is based on a secret interfering in privacy for instance: a wire tapping by such services as police or secret service. This controversial solution has led so far to the reduction of crimes, especially organized. It can be justified by Max Weber’s ethics of responsibility. A lawmaker, however, has to protect the whole political community by some controversial institutions from the moral point of view.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/13293
DOI: 10.14746/fped.2014.3.1.10
ISBN: 978-83-7092-159-0
ISSN: 2299-1875
Appears in Collections:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2014, Tom 3 Nr 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10 Mazur.pdf666.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons