Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/13608
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZarzecka, Iga-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-07T10:47:28Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-07T10:47:28Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-
dc.identifier.citationRight to property - is it really inviolable? Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, Special Edition, 2014, pp. 419-425pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2083-9782-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/13608-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study is to evaluate the status of an artist’s cultural heritage in the national context on the example of Nikolaj Gogol. The author makes an attempt to answer whether Gogol’s work belongs to Russia or Ukraine by presenting the status of the particular oeuvres of the artist.pl_PL
dc.language.isorupl_PL
dc.publisherEuropejskie Stowarzyszenie Studentów Prawa ELSA Poznańpl_PL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl_PL
dc.subjectNikolaj Gogolpl_PL
dc.subjectcultural heritagepl_PL
dc.subjectcultural propertypl_PL
dc.titleВечный вопрос: Какой стране принадлежит Гоголь − России или Украине?pl_PL
dc.title.alternativeInternal question: To which country Gogol belongs to – Russia or Ukraine?pl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, vol. 4, 2014

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
43 Zarzecka.pdf215.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons