Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/13731
Title: Orzecznictwo sądów amerykańskich w sprawach niewolnictwa – pomiędzy formalizmem a subwersją
Other Titles: American courts adjudication concerning slavery – between formalism and subversion
Authors: Zajadło, Jerzy
Keywords: conflict between law and the moral conscience of judges
judicial disobedience
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM
Citation: Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2014 Tom 3, Nr 2, s. 70-96.
Abstract: Article discusses a dilemma of judge facing a possibility (or necessity) of applying judicial disobedience. From the philosophical as well as theoretical point of view, the most intriguing would be an instance of judicial disobedience when applied to a state of democracy and the rule of law. In order to (re-)construct such an instance, the article traces the reader back to the middle of the 19th Century, when the moral conscience of (at least) some of American judges drove them to searching for the sound justification of judicial disobedience when faced with problem of slavery.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/13731
DOI: 10.14746/fped.2014.3.2.17
ISBN: 978-83-7092-161-3
ISSN: 2299-1875
Appears in Collections:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2014, Tom 3 Nr 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
05-Zajadlo.pdf681.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons