Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Istota i znaczenie (funkcje) zasad postępowania sądowoadministracyjnego
Other Titles: The essence and meaning of the administrative court proceeding
Authors: Wiktorowska, Aleksandra
Keywords: legal principle 
law making 
law enforcement
construction/interpretation of law
codified law non-codified law
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM
Citation: Studia Prawa Publicznego, 2016, Nr 14, s. 31-47.
Abstract: There are two main platforms on which the role and importance of the principles of procedural law can be observed. One concerns the basic functions played by these principles, i.e. the function that orders the process, the function that shapes the process model, the interpretative function and the cognitive function. The other platform concerns the reference sphere i.e. a sphere to which these principles are or may be of importance owing to the functions they have. Thus it comprises the sphere of making and enforcing law and its criticism, the law teaching and researching sphere, the practical sphere, the political-ideological sphere and last but not least the sphere of codifi ed and non-codifi ed law. This division however is not absolute. There exists, for example, convergence between the sphere of law enforcement and law practice as well as between the sphere of law criticism and law teaching or researching. A similar convergence may be observed between the law making and the political-ideological spheres. The two platforms cross over and create meeting points in which individual functions of principles in relevant reference spheres may be marked. At the law-making stage, the ordering function harmonises legal solutions adopted in a legislative act whereas at the law-enforcement stage it facilitates construction of a legal text. The shaping of a model of proceedings in administrative courts by principles means that these principles make it possible to determine the structure of institutions and procedural solutions in proceedings before administrative courts, while the interpretative function occurs only in the sphere of law enforcement and criticism. The cognitive function is mainly signifi cant for the law teaching and researching sphere, but also for the law practice, including criticism.
DOI: 10.14746/stpp.2016.2.14.2
ISBN: 978-83-232-3093-9
ISSN: 2300-3936
Appears in Collections:Studia Prawa Publicznego, 2016, Nr 2 (14)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SPP_2_14_2016_Aleksandra_Wiktorowska.pdf174.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.