Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/19269
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKulczycki, Emanuel-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-04T11:45:47Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-04T11:45:47Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationKulczycki, E. (2017). Kariera drapieżnych czasopism – przypadek Anny O. Szust. Nauka 3/2017. ss. 71–83.pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1231-8515-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/19269-
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the challenges and problems caused by predatory journals in scholarly communication. By focusing on the editorial practices, I describe the case of Dr. Anna Fraud (Anna O. Szust in Polish): a bogus scientist created by four Polish scholars. Dr. Fraud became a member of editorial boards in over 40 scientific journals although she is a fake person and, obviously has no experience in journal editing. The present paper aims to show that scientist always have to care about a quality control and a peer review system. The article concludes with a presentation of the ‘Think. Check. Submit’ Initiative which provides useful and helpful tools for analysing journals by potential contributors.pl_PL
dc.language.isopolpl_PL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl_PL
dc.subjectCzasopisma drapieżnepl_PL
dc.subjectPredatory Journalspl_PL
dc.subjectAnna Olga Szustpl_PL
dc.subjectDr. Fraudpl_PL
dc.subjectLista Beallapl_PL
dc.subjectBeall’s Listpl_PL
dc.titleKariera drapieżnych czasopism – przypadek Anny O. Szustpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Artykuły naukowe (WNS)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
N#317-06-Kulczycki.pdf166.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.