Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/2002
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPlessis Du, Paul J.-
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-06T13:47:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-06T13:47:53Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationCzasopismo Prawno-Historyczne, 2010, z. 2, s.19-29.pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0070-2471-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/2002-
dc.description.abstractThe paper is an attempt to answer the fundamental question whether there is any rationale behind studying Roman law for the sake of modern science and the teaching of law. In the first part of the paper, the possibility of rejecting reading Roman law as being useless from the point of view of contemporary jurisprudence is considered. It is also proposed that the current state of affairs is the result of implementation in legal history studies of R. Zimmermann’s vision that Roman law and comparative law are two useful instruments for harmonising private law. Further, a claim is made that the outcome of the discussions on the harmonisation of private law, the so-called Common Frame of Reference has been developed with no references to the accomplishments of legal history. This innovative and modern approach is then discussed and a question is asked whether it would be possible and expedient to take a fresher look at Roman law, and propose a more realistic element to jurisprudence, rejecting, at the same time, the dogmatic method, and focus, instead, on the reflection on the essence and merit of law, and the relationship between law and the environment in which it is applied. This, in the author’s opinion, should serve to make the study of Roman law more independent in relation to the current doctrine of private law. The author then concludes that Roman law may be useful for the construction of private law but only on condition that it is not reduced to an ideological banner supporting the myth of a united Europe, as the true usefulness of Roman law should be the identification of universal elements and provision of arguments to challenge the currently adopted dogmatic vision of private law.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Poznańskie sp. z o.o.pl_PL
dc.subjectHistoria prawapl_PL
dc.subjectNauki prawnepl_PL
dc.subjectMetodologiapl_PL
dc.titleHistoria prawa a metodologia nauk prawnych.pl_PL
dc.title.alternativeLEGAL HISTORY AND METHODS OF JURISPRUDENCE.pl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne, 2010, z. 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Du Plessis.pdf210.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.