Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBiałas, Anna-
dc.identifier.citationPeitho. Examina Antiqua, nr 1(1), 2010, s. 145-159.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractThe most famous medieval controversy over the power and the temporal dominion took place between the papacy and the empire. One of the greatest advocates of the imperial domination was Marsilius of Padua, the author of an original work that demonstrated the advantage of acknowledging the emperor’s superiority over the Pope’s. The Defen¬sor pacis, written between 1319 and 1324, was devoted to the dispute on such sovereignty issues as proving that the Pope should be subordinate to the Emperor, and not vice versa. The Defensor pacis takes issue with numerous arguments and views uttered by the papal camp and uses the appropriate quotations from the Bible and Aristotle to show their weakness and inconsistency. The work comprises three parts. The first part is a description of the ideal system, i.e., an elective monarchy, with the specified role of a ruler and a clear indication of the sovereignty of the people. The second and third parts present a challenge to the arguments of the papal camp (including the famous argument of the “power keys”) and analyze the general situation of the Church, suggesting the necessary reforms. Thus, the whole work becomes a compendium of knowledge on appropriate governance.pl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAMpl_PL
dc.subjectMarsilius of Paduapl_PL
dc.subjectMediaeval political philosophypl_PL
dc.titleWokół sporu papieża i cesarza o władzę — Marsyliusza z Padwy Defensor pacispl_PL
Appears in Collections:Peitho. Examina Antiqua, nr 1(1), 2010

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Białas.pdf479.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.