Polemika na temat przydatności podziału na czynności kauzalne i abstrakcyjne – wybrane zagadnienia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Advisor

Editor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM

Title alternative

The polemic of usefulness divide of causation and non-causation legal actions – chosen issues

Abstract

The author has presented different conception of dualistic divide on causation and non-causation legal actions. The analyses focuses on need to abandon that dualistic divide. The main argument is ambiguity word of causae. Author’s view is based on polish conventional legal actions theory. It professes that each legal action has got constructional and consequential principles, which are sufficient to describe consideration of them.

Description

Sponsor

Keywords

causae, legal action, conventional legal action theory, obligation

Citation

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2017, Tom 6, Nr 2, s. 125-142.

ISBN

Title Alternative

Rights Creative Commons

Creative Commons License

Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego