Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/24093
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWiland, Bartosz-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-05T09:27:54Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-05T09:27:54Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-23-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of NELS 48, eds. S. Hucklebridge, M. Nelson. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications (2018), 235-244.pl
dc.identifier.isbn978-1727605822-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/24093-
dc.description.abstractThis short paper shows that in certain grammatical environments acceptability of extractions from fronted constituents in Polish is at a similar level as acceptability of the variants involving pied-piping. This suggests that the Freezing Condition, a procedural ban on movement out of a moved constituent, is too coarse. Such a result opens up the possibility for the so-called 'peeling derivations' to be in principle legal.pl
dc.language.isoengpl
dc.publisherGLSA Publications, Univwrsity of Massachusetts Amherstpl
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl
dc.subjectfreezing conditionpl
dc.subjectpeelingpl
dc.subjectextractionpl
dc.subjectstrandingpl
dc.subjectacceptabilitypl
dc.subjectwh-movementpl
dc.subjectleft branch extractionpl
dc.titleAnti-freezing and peelingpl
dc.typeMateriały konferencyjnepl
Appears in Collections:Materiały konferencyjne (WA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wiland-nels48style.pdf87.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.