Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, Raul-
dc.identifier.citationPeitho. Examina Antiqua, nr 1(10), 2019, s. 65-84pl
dc.description.abstractAs Plato’s Phaedrus 246c stipulates, every logos must be structured like a living being, i.e., the relation of all its parts to one another and to the whole must be appropriate. Thus, the present paper argues that Plato’s masterwork has been organized in accord with the ascent/descent movement as presented in the Allegory of the Cave: Book I represents eikasia, Books II–IV.434c exemplify pistis, Book IV.434d–444e illustrates dianoia and Books V–VII express noesis. Having reached the anabasis (with the Sun, the Line and the Cave images) the philosopher turns to the consideration of the deficient or unjust forms of the souls and the corresponding political regimes. Finally, the discussion comes back to eikasia through the renewed criticism of mimesis and the exposition of the Myth of Er. As is typical of Plato, this is not merely a formal matter, since the structure conveys that as the Good makes the Ideas intelligible, so the Sun, the Line and the Cave images also throw light on the whole
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAMpl
dc.subjectPlato’s Cave Allegorypl
dc.titleThe Structure of Plato’s Republic and the Cave Allegorypl
Appears in Collections:Peitho. Examina Antiqua, nr 1(10), 2019

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Peitho 10 2019 03_GUTIEREZ.pdf679.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons