Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/4333
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLieberman, Leonard-
dc.contributor.authorKirk, Rodney C.-
dc.contributor.authorCorcoran, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-06T12:23:22Z-
dc.date.available2013-02-06T12:23:22Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationAnthropological Review, vol. 66, 2003, pp. 3-21pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0033-2003-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/4333-
dc.description.abstractThis paper is a review of how and why the race concept has changed in the United States during the 20th century. In the 19th century the concept of race provided the unchallenged folk taxonomy and the prevailing scientific paradigm for placing human biological and cultural variation into categories called races. At the height of the eugenic and anti-immigration movement of the early decades of the 20th century, Boas and his students began the critique of racism and aspects of the race concept. In the early 1950s Washburn proposed that the modern synthesis replace race typology with the study of processes and populations. In the 1960s new data on clinical genetic gradations provided tools for studying human variation while challenging the race consept. We present the several kinds of ducumentaion of the decline of the race consept over 20th century, and place the above changes in the context of the essential development of new genetic evidence. We also relate the decline of race to historical developments, the growth of the culture concept, and the biographies of the participants. We reject political correctness and view science as a self-correcting endeavor to relate concepts to the empirical world.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherPolskie Towarzystwo Antropologicznepl_PL
dc.subjectracepl_PL
dc.subjectclinepl_PL
dc.subjectpopulationpl_PL
dc.subjectBoaspl_PL
dc.subjectWashburnpl_PL
dc.titleThe decline of race in American physical anthropologypl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Anthropological Review, 2003, vol. 66

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01lieb.pdf419.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.