Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/5868
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrzechczyn, Krzysztof-
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-12T07:29:37Z-
dc.date.available2013-04-12T07:29:37Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationCzłowiek i Społeczeństwo, 2012, vol. 34, pp. 235-247pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0239-3271-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/5868-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to consider the influence of the methodological status of the concept of the totalitarian syndrome on the strategy of its development. It is argued that the totalitarian syndrome as put forward by Carl J. Friedrich and Zbigniew Brzezinski represented a kind of social modelling. However, there are different approaches to modelling in the social sciences. Modelling, when perceived from a neo-Hegelian perspectives, leads to the elaboration of dependencies between social phenomenon and their main factors. Modelling, when seen from a neo-Weberian perspective, relies on the construction of notions which systematize and order social phenomena. This hypothesis is illustrated by a methodological analysis of the extension of the totalitarian syndrome authored by Achim Siegel and Mark Thompson.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnicwo Naukowe UAMpl_PL
dc.subjectidealizationpl_PL
dc.subjecttotalitarianismpl_PL
dc.subjectcommunismpl_PL
dc.subjectmethodology of social sciencespl_PL
dc.subjectmodelingpl_PL
dc.subjectideal typespl_PL
dc.titleVarieties of Idealization and Strategies of Modification of Social Theory. The Case of the Totalitarian Syndromepl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Artykuły naukowe (WNS)
Człowiek i Społeczeństwo, 34/2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Brzech_CiS_12.pdf147.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.