Nowak, Ewa2017-06-282017-06-282016DIALOGUE AND UNIVERSALISM, vol. 26 (2), 2016, pp. 157-1801234-5792http://hdl.handle.net/10593/18034The paper re–contextualizes Marek Siemek´s transcendentalist approach to the reciprocal recogniton in new contexts (phenomenology and hermeneutics)The paper examines the evolution of Marek Siemek’s “dialogical principle.” The early version of this principle, sketched in the essay “Dialogue and Its Myth” (1974), meets several criteria of the phenomenology of dialogue and even hermeneutics. How- ever, Siemek has continued to change his concept of dialogue over the decades. In his recent book, Freedom, Reason, Intersubjectivity (2002), he explores transcendental preconditions of free and reasonable activism, i.e., the Fichtean “limitative synthesis” of I and Non-I and its applications in social interrelations. He no longer considers the em- pirical, anthropological, and phenomenological aspects of dialogics and mutual recognition. He also replaces mutuality with reciprocity, asymmetry with symmetry, and phe- nomenology with transcendentalism.enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarek SiemekdialoguerecognitionmutualityreciprocityGoethe and Schiller relationtruthmythtranscendentalismphenomenologyArtykuł