Laino, Luigi2018-09-242018-09-242017Ethics in Progress (ISSN 2084-9257). Vol. 8 (2017). No. 1, Art. #2, pp. 12-40. Doi: 10.14746/eip.2017.1.22084-9257http://hdl.handle.net/10593/23872In the present paper, the author aims at laying the foundations of a symbolics of technical gesture, according to the thesis that symbolic faculty is another face of the technological one, and that they are both in truth two sides of the same coin. Accordingly, the author suggests to rename the whole dimen-sion as “meta-environmentality”. The analysis is carried out on the basis of a specific comparison between Cassirer’s definition of “animal symbolicum” and its scientific consistence in the light of modern palaeontology. “Animal symbol-icum” is here compared with Leroi-Gourhan’s homo technologicus, and Cassi-rer’s ideas on human identity tested starting from paleoanthropological data. The result of the inquiry lead us to recognize the urgency of integrating Cassi-rer’s argument with the primacy of the technological capacity, but a deep anal-ysis of the characterizing attributes of the latter compels us to uphold the symbolic attitude of the technological dimension. The author then sketches a basic description of the guidelines of a symbolic theory of technology (espe-cially §§ 6-7), and tries to show how the basic elements of such an approach were familiar both to Cassirer and Leroi-Gourhan. As a consequence of the whole theory, the author elaborates a chronological analysis of human identity, whose basic result is the determination of the future as main temporal dimen-sion of human acting.enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPhilosophy of CulturePhilosophical AnthropologyPhilosophy of PalaeoanthropologyCassirerLeroi-GourhanArtykułhttps://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2017.1.2