Konkubinat a bezpodstawne wzbogacenie (uwagi na tle judykatury Sądu Najwyższego)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

1989

Advisor

Editor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM

Title alternative

Cohabitation without marriage and unjustified enrichment. Remarks in the light of the supreme court decisions

Abstract

The author criticizes the view expressed by the Supreme Court that in cases of cohabitation without marriage there is no room for all types of condictions (condictio indebiti, condictio sine causa, condictio causa data causa non secuta, condictio causa finita) may arise between the cohabiting partners. He also criticizes the application of the construction of „obligation de conscience" to claims raised by informal spouses, indicating that the above construction of the French civil law is incompatible with the Polish civil law provisions. In particular, the notion of „obligation de conscience" obscures the distinction between legal and moral norms and makes it difficult to arrive at a plausible interpretation of Art. 411 sec. 2 of the Civil Code on imperfect obligations.

Description

Sponsor

Digitalizacja i deponowanie archiwalnych zeszytów RPEiS sfinansowane przez MNiSW w ramach realizacji umowy nr 541/P-DUN/2016

Keywords

Citation

Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 51, 1989, z. 3, s. 107-118.

Seria

ISBN

ISSN

0035-9629

DOI

Title Alternative

Rights Creative Commons

Creative Commons License

Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego