Konkubinat a bezpodstawne wzbogacenie (uwagi na tle judykatury Sądu Najwyższego)
Loading...
Date
1989
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
Title alternative
Cohabitation without marriage and unjustified enrichment. Remarks in the light of the supreme court decisions
Abstract
The author criticizes the view expressed by the Supreme Court that in cases
of cohabitation without marriage there is no room for all types of condictions
(condictio indebiti, condictio sine causa, condictio causa data causa non secuta,
condictio causa finita) may arise between the cohabiting partners. He also
criticizes the application of the construction of „obligation de conscience" to claims
raised by informal spouses, indicating that the above construction of the French
civil law is incompatible with the Polish civil law provisions. In particular, the notion
of „obligation de conscience" obscures the distinction between legal and moral
norms and makes it difficult to arrive at a plausible interpretation of Art. 411
sec. 2 of the Civil Code on imperfect obligations.
Description
Sponsor
Digitalizacja i deponowanie archiwalnych zeszytów RPEiS sfinansowane przez MNiSW w ramach realizacji umowy nr 541/P-DUN/2016
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 51, 1989, z. 3, s. 107-118.