Dokuczliwy skrzyp hermeneutycznego koła – komentarz do artykułu Andrzeja Szahaja
| dc.contributor.author | Szajnert, Danuta | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-14T11:27:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-08-14T11:27:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This essay is merely an additional commentary on the article entitled “Hirsch o interpretacji. Analiza krytyczna” (“Hirsch on interpretation. A critical analysis”). I do not focus here on Szahaj’s detailed objections to the concepts proposed by the author of Validity in Interpretation. I concentrate instead on the idea that forms the basis for such objections, i.e. radical, cultural interpretative constructivism. As a skeptical intentionalist, I cannot fully share his opinion and, therefore, I draw attention to views according to which the constructivist paradigm is becoming conventionalized and exhausted (especially in the humanities) and to the possible ways in which it can be overcome. | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.citation | Przestrzenie Teorii, 2013, nr 20, s. 207-217 | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-232-2654-3 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1644-6763 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10593/11335 | |
| dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Dokuczliwy skrzyp hermeneutycznego koła – komentarz do artykułu Andrzeja Szahaja | pl_PL |
| dc.title.alternative | The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s article | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Artykuł | pl_PL |