Browsing by Author "Pertek, Grzegorz"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item „Jest ja, ale mnie nie ma” – granica poetyckiego szaleństwa Rafała Wojaczka(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM w Poznaniu, 2011) Pertek, GrzegorzIn this article the author made an attempt at demarcating the limits of the poetic language of Rafał Wojaczek, the crossing of which – as the author of this study thinks – opens before the poet a possibility of achieving the perfectness of the subject of his poems, portending the specter of madness. This project is combined with the problems of the crisis of identity being both the reason and the consequence of the many renewed attempts at its realisation. The author claims that from this point of view, it was in the Dziennik [Diary] (the first of the analysed texts) Wojaczek as an author his desire of perfection and discovers that it is unattainable beyond madness. Dziennik is also a place of the first experience of the crisis in view of which the debut Sezon [Season], and in particular the poem which opens that book, and which has the same title as the whole (another text submitted to interpretaion), is only its poetic rewriting. Such a view allows the author to reveal the intertextual opening. In the course of analysis of the poem, difficulties connected with the realisation of the project, i.e. obtaining oneself as authentic in the language, just defining of identity, the source of which is Arthur Rimbaud’s philosophy, is exposed. Nevertheless Wojaczek’s subject is neither a repetition of the model of Rimbaud nor its denial, but a transfer of elusiveness of the changeable “I”, expressed by means of the formula “I is someone else”, into the area of absence. The considerations are capped with the interpretation of the work Piszę wiersz [I am writing a poem], which is a poetic verification of diagnoses made by Wojaczek in Sezon.Item Transgresja i literatura(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2014) Pertek, GrzegorzThe author of this article attempts to redefine the category of transgression. By preparing a preliminary typology of the existing uses of this concept, he puts forward the hypothesis that, on the one hand, transgression can be identified with (is synonymous with) going beyond the limit of something, and on the other hand, it can be equated with the constant conflict between its empirical and linguistic dimensions as well as its thematization and formalization. The author proposes to define transgression as the act of setting/removing a certain limit. This definition overcomes the above-mentioned difficulties because it not only has an ambiguous aspect (undecidability), i.e. both a positive (construction) and a negative (destruction) dimension, but it also pushes the issues related to transgression into the domain of negotiations, i.e. interactions with the reader (reception, tradition and criticism), from which it derives its inventive potential.Item Transgresywność (w) polskiej poezji powojennej(2021) Pertek, Grzegorz; Przymuszała, Beata. PromotorPrzedmiotem rozprawy jest zagadnienie transgresji w polskiej poezji powojennej, analizowane na przykładzie trzech autorów: Ryszarda Krynickiego, Rafała Wojaczka i Marcina Świetlickiego. Dysertacja składa się z pięciu rozdziałów. W rozdziałach pierwszym i drugim dokonuję rozpoznania możliwości i zagrożeń związanych z próbą zastosowania pojęcia transgresji w badaniach literackich. Zaproponowane w nich ujęcie metodologiczno-teoretyczne pozwala stwierdzić, że transgresja mogłaby stanowić trzecią metaforę metodologiczną, po genezie i strukturze, definiującą rozwój dyskursu teoretycznoliterackiego dążącego przez cały XX wiek do przekroczenia opozycji między metodami zewnętrznymi a metodami wewnętrznymi. Tendencja ta przybiera szczególny obrót po 1989 roku, czyli w momencie otwarcia na zachodnią krytykę strukturalizmu. Celem trzech kolejnych rozdziałów poświęconych twórczości wskazanych poetów jest odnalezienie przez interpretację możliwości redukowania dystansu między poezją a jej recepcją. Mają temu służyć określone mechanizmy dyskursywne: poróżnienie, placebo i przedawnienie, wypracowane na gruncie podejmowanej przez poetów na różne sposoby dyskusji z krytyką. „Spór” traktuję jako pole dyskursywne o charakterze transgresyjnym.Item "Wyrok" Rafała Wojaczka jako kres możliwości podmiotu(2012) Pertek, GrzegorzThe present article attempts to interpret the poem "Wyrok" [The Verdict] written by Rafał Wojaczek. The author tries to reveal the rules of the game in the play with psychoanalysis that are set in motion in the poem by the introduction of the Freudian signature to the text. Citing the Oedipus complex as one of the “representative” mechanisms for the development of the phenomenon of unawareness, he proceeds to prove that the theory of psychoanalysis as the interpretative context can function on the principle of the paradox, i.e. the stronger the denial of it within the subject, the more important it becomes for the understanding of the work. In this way, Wojaczek, by making the poem heretically sealed, opens it up to interpretation and, eventually, implies that its sense goes beyond any explanation (negation of psychoanalysis as an interpretative method). This last statement makes the basis for a formulation of further assumptions on the psychical structure of the subject (conscious unawareness and unconscious awareness), as well as the relations between the author, the subject and the lyrical protagonist where the author, after exceeding the limits of the poem, splits himself into two instances: textual representation (that of the father) and the lyrical “I” that is the irrevocable verdict condemning the poet to making them fit into language and grammar. An attempt, then, at salvation and a coupling of the body (blood) with the lingering word turns out, however, to be deadly, a carrying out of the verdict.