Browsing by Author "Piszko, Robert"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    ODESŁANIA, KLAUZULE GENERALNE, LUZY DECYZYJNE
    (Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM, 2001) Piszko, Robert
  • Item
    Wybrane problemy źródeł prawa
    (Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM, 1994) Piotrowski, Artur; Kozłowski, Tomasz; Piszko, Robert; Kordela, Marzena
    Those papers concern selected issues taken from the area of the origin of the law and the legal system. The authors consider relations between changes in the concepts of the origin of law and formal transformations of the legal system. A. Piotrowski stresses an increasing number of judicial decisions in the Polish statutory law, which in consequence blur the sharp line between the making and the execution of law. T. Kozłowski describes difficulties which are currently encountered in the process of the law-making in the light of a collapse of the authority of the law, and postulates a detailed research into that phenomenon. R. Piszko provides a global characteristics of the relations between the legal system and other systems outside that system, operating in the same environment and argues that concepts in that area should be precisely defined. M. Kordela discusses the role of ombudsman in Poland in the reconstruction process of legal principles (material, formal and institutional) on which a concept of legal state, and the contents of its concept are based.
  • Item
    ZASADY TECHNIKI PRAWODAWCZEJ W PRAKTYCE WYKŁADNI PRAWA
    (Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM, 2002) Piszko, Robert
    The conviction about the existence o f certain correspondence between the directives o f editing and interpreting legal texts is based upon the belief that it is the legislator that sets out the linguistic and axiological limits of law application of a legal text; this conviction is also connected with the developed notion o f rational legislator. However, initially one did not use to speak o f the need to create correspondence between the directives of editing and interpreting legal texts in spite of the fact that one was aware of the connection between law creation and interpretation. The author sets out to determine: (i) which of the previously foreseen ways of attaining correspondence was applied during the creation of the official set of legislative technique principles, (ii) whether and to what extent correspondence between legislative technique principles and literal law interpretation directives was attained, and (iii) to what extent the „Legislative Technique Principles” o f 1991 has given rise to the conviction of correspondence between the directives o f law creation and interpretation in the legal practice.