Browsing by Author "STANIEWSKA, ANNA"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Funkcje zasady wzajemnej zgodności we Wspólnej Polityce Rolnej(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2011) STANIEWSKA, ANNAThe subject matter of these considerations concerns functions of the cross compliance within the framework of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). References to this prin-ciple are found in many legal acts, both in the first and the second pillar of CAP. The author discusses cross compliance in view of the functions of agriculture. In conclusion the author states among other things that cross compliance does not di-rectly concern the primary function of agriculture, i.e. production of goods to be sold on the market, paid for using market prices or the resulting revenue function, connected with the livelihood of farmers. The basic function of cross compliance is to contribute to the provision of public goods by agriculture. The most important such goods include protec-tion of the natural environment and assurance of food safety. Cross compliance also con-tributes to the creation of public goods of social and recreation nature. An essential func-tion of cross compliance, although not resulting directly from the respective legal regulations, is also to justify the Common Agricultural Policy, both on the international scale and for the European community.Item Pojęcie kontroli w prawie dotyczącym pomocy Unii Europejskiej dla rolnictwa(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2010) STANIEWSKA, ANNAControl is one of the key elements in all support systems offered by the European Union. Special tools and control procedures are found in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Control within the EU support for agriculture functions based on a specific system, referred to as the integrated administration and control system. In the conclusion the Author stated that the concept of control found within the EU support system for agriculture is not equivalent to the concept of control existing in the Polish doctrine of administrative law, in which control is defined in opposition to supervision, as a process devoid of authority elements. In contrast, the analysed concept is closer to the definitions originating from the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition, according to which control is a process of management and regulation. The Author proposed the following definition of the analysed concept: it is a cyclical regulation process, initiated by a comparison of the analysed object to a model, of legal or actual character, in the course of which obtained information is used both to modify the legal situation of the controlled subject and the actual situation of the implemented control system.