Browsing by Author "Szulc, Piotr"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Best Practices in Real Estate Cross-border Transactions(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2020) Szulc, PiotrThe article presents reflections on the best practices in real estate cross border transactions.Transactions on real estate markets have several aspects that make them highly complex, mostly due to their individual nature – each property is unique in terms of its location, structure and history. Cross-border transactions on the real estate market are becoming increasingly popular as the world becomes more globalized. The growing volume of this type of transaction presents a challenge for the modern real estate lawyer. It is impossible to create an exhaustive guide setting out all the hazards occurring in such transactions. This article addresses this difficult challenge by indicating the most important of them.It is essential and extremely helpful to enter into cooperation with a local counsel who will help us to explain the local specificity and who will take the legal differences into account. In addition, other helpful tools, such as a legal due diligence report or a title insurance Policy, should be carefully considered. One cannot forget about the importance of the local culture and customs, which may prove decisive at the crucial moment of the transaction. Finally, to be effective in working with cross-border clients, lawyers must have a good understanding of how people think and make decisions, and must possess good people skills. Respect for local customs and traditions, as well as understanding the local legal system while securing clients’ interests, is the key to a successful transaction.Item Decyzja o warunkach zabudowy i zagospodarowania terenu jako instrument kształtowania przestrzeni(2021) Szulc, Piotr; Szewczyk, Marek. Promotor; Staniszewska, Lucyna. Promotor pomocniczyPlanowanie i zagospodarowanie przestrzenne powinno polegać na dążeniu do eliminowania potencjalnych konfliktów przestrzennych. Ustawodawca, stanowiąc normy materialnego prawa administracyjnego, nie zawsze jednak jest w stanie określić treść interesów prawnych jednostek tak, aby w pełni zostały one zaspokojone. Zdaniem wielu przedstawicieli doktryny to instytucja decyzji o warunkach zabudowy – będąca w centrum zainteresowania niniejszej pracy – stanowi węzłowy problem planowania przestrzennego i częściej szkodzi ładowi przestrzennemu, niż umożliwia jego racjonalne kształtowanie. Założenie większości przedstawicieli doktryny, że decyzje o warunkach zabudowy są przyczyną wszelkiego zła wydaje się jednak nietrafne. Rozprawa porusza istotne z teoretycznego i praktycznego punktu widzenia problemy badawcze takie jak charakter prawny decyzji o warunkach zabudowy, zagadnienie obniżenia lub wzrostu wartości nieruchomości w związku z wydaniem decyzji o warunkach zabudowy i kwestii odszkodowania związanego z obniżeniem wartości, jak również tzw. wywłaszczenia planistycznego, czyli faktycznego pozbawienia właściciela nieruchomości możliwości korzystania z niej w sposób ekonomicznie uzasadniony na skutek ustalenia warunków korzystania z nieruchomości w drodze decyzji o warunkach zabudowy. Praca obejmuje również badania prawnoporównawcze obejmujące angielski system planowania przestrzennego.Item Geraint Ellis, Discourses of Objection: Towards an Understanding of Third-party Rights in Planning (W kierunku zrozumienia uprawnień podmiotów trzecich w planowaniu przestrzennym), „Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space” 2004, vol. 36, DOI:10.1068/a36176, p. 1549–1570(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2020) Szulc, PiotrItem Item Potential invalidity of the decision of a public administrative body as a result of the conviction of a person performing a function (Ewentualna nieważność decyzji organu administracji publicznej w wyniku skazania osoby pełniącej określoną funkcję)(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2019) Szulc, PiotrThe article presents the reflections on the potential invalidity of an administrative decision of a public administrative body as a result of the conviction of a person performing a function for an offence under Polish law. Firstly, the author analyses the legal situation of a person convicted for an offence under the Election Code (Kodeks wyborczy), the Act on Self-Government Employees (Ustawa o pracownikach samorządowych) and the Labour Code (Kodeks pracy). He examines in detail the discrepancies between the three legislative acts which may influence the legal position of a convicted person. The conclusion is that a person with the final and valid judgment for intentional offence prosecuted by public indictment to a fine or to penalty of imprisonment retains a passive electoral right in the elections for the mayor, however it seems that under the Act on Self-Government Employees it will not be possible to establish an employment relationship with such a person to work in the capacity of a self-government employee based on election. Secondly, the author analyses the potential invalidity of administrative decisions issued by a person convicted for an offence. The two conditions that could be taken into account as grounds for declaring the invalidity of an administrative decision in the context of the conviction are: a lack of jurisdiction of the authority as a condition of declaring the invalidity of a decision and a gross breach of law as a condition of declaring invalidity of a decision. The analysis of the selected conditions leads to a conclusion that there are no grounds for declaring the invalidity of a decision, as the regulations on jurisdiction will not be breached and the decision will not be issued in gross breach of law. Therefore, even if one were to consider that under the Act on Self-Government Employees a given person cannot be a self-government employee, it seems that this does not prevent the issuance of administrative decisions.