Próba obliczania efektywności programu rozwoju (Na przykładzie gospodarki mięsnej)
Loading...
Date
1966
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
Title alternative
Abstract
One of the most important difficulties in working out a complex development
program for various branches of national economy is the methodological difficulty
in finding out the proper optimum variant. In this paper the author undertook
an attempt to work out a method of assessing the efficiency of a proposed, development
program. The attempt is based on the data relevant to the meat economy.
The development of the meat economy rests on the expected growth of processing
and commercial activites. The foreseen tasks can be carried out at the existing
structure of industry or after some changes in it (concentration).
In order to assess the efficiency of the development program of meat economy
the author compares:
a) two variants of meat processing and of transport (for raw material —
meat and ready products),
b) two variants of investement inputs, necessary to enlarge the production
capacity and to improve the economic efficiency of said inputs.
The comparison of these two variants shows the economic advantages in
processing costs and investment inputs.
The author is of the opinion that a concentration process would contribute
to greater savings in production costs and in the costs of shifting the raw-meat
surpluses.
The investment efficiency at the existing structure and at the newly proposed
structure — points to the advantage of the latter one.
The concentration of production would also produce some non measurable
effects, such as a better raw-material economy, greater possibilities of raising
the quality of products and an improvement on the meat market (better supplies).
Description
Sponsor
Digitalizacja i deponowanie archiwalnych zeszytów RPEiS sfinansowane przez MNiSW w ramach realizacji umowy nr 541/P-DUN/2016
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 28, 1966, z. 3, s. 177-191