Rozwój usług łączności w okresie dwudziestopięciolecia PRL
Loading...
Date
1970
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
Title alternative
Development of Communication Services in the 25 Years' Period of People's Poland
Abstract
In the 25-years period of Polish People's Republic the achievements of the
Communication Department including its basic divisions: the post-office and the
telecommunication were remarkable and become still more spectacular if we take
into consideration the fact that communication facilities had to be completely rebuilt
because of the tremendous destruction caused by the war and the devastation of
facilities done by the Nazi occupant. Owing to the rebuilding and developing of
communication facilities their actual potential exceeds the pre-war state very
remarkably. The increase in post-office services of transport and bank types compared to
the level of 1938 is illustrated with the following data: ordinary letters — 151%,
registered letters — 342%, magazines — 215%, parcels — 182%, postal and telegraphic
orders — 253%, savings put in the post-office — 188%.
In 1968 there were almost 960.000 telephone subscribers (in 1939 only 225,400),
2,95 telephone subscribers and 5,09 telephones to 100 inhabitants (in 1938 0.64 and
0,86 respectively), 1063 trunk calls and 43 telegrams to 100 inhabitants (in 1939 80
and 11.4 respectively). Telex service that was unknown in this country in the pre-war
period covered 3100 subscribers and 9.4 teleprinters of the telex network to 100.000
inhabitants in 1968.
General development of post-office and telecommunication services was accompanied
by a simultaneous leveling or reducing of differences in that field in towns
and villages, in the provinces and their capitals, in accordance with the economic
and cultural development of the whole country.
Description
Sponsor
Digitalizacja i deponowanie archiwalnych zeszytów RPEiS sfinansowane przez MNiSW w ramach realizacji umowy nr 541/P-DUN/2016
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 32, 1970, z. 3, s. 249-270