Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/25473
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShech, Elay-
dc.contributor.authorGelfert, Axel-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-04T09:36:19Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-04T09:36:19Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationStudia Metodologiczne, nr 39, 2019, s. 195–232.-
dc.identifier.issn0039424X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/25473-
dc.description.abstractIn this article we argue that idealizations and limiting cases in models play an exploratory role in science. Four senses of exploration are presented: exploration of the structure and representational capacities of theory; proof-of-principle demonstrations; potential explanations; and exploring the suitability of target systems. We illustrate our claims through three case studies, including the Aharonov-Bohm effect, the emergence of anyons and fractional quantum statistics, and the Hubbard model of the Mott phase transition. We end by reflecting on how our case studies and claims compare to accounts of idealization in the philosophy of science literature such as Michael Weisberg’s three-fold taxonomy.pl
dc.language.isoengpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe UAM-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl
dc.subjectexplorationpl
dc.subjectidealizationpl
dc.subjectmodelspl
dc.titleThe Exploratory Role of Idealizations and Limiting Cases in Modelspl
dc.typeArtykułpl
Appears in Collections:Studia Metodologiczne, 2019, nr 39

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SM39_MT_Cz¦Ö+Ť¦ç9.pdf2.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.