Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/25477
Title: The Curious Case of Formal Theory in Political Science: How Did It Emerge as a Discipline, Why Its Existence Is a Sign of a Failure, and Why the Science of Politics Is Not Possible Without It?
Authors: Swistak, Piotr
Keywords: formal theory
axiomatic theory
formal theory field in political science
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM
Citation: Studia Metodologiczne, nr 39, 2019, s. 99–121.
Abstract: American political science has evolved a subfield which is commonly referred to as formal theory. Political scientists identify themselves as specializing in formal theory, departments advertise faculty positions in formal theory and put together formal theory subfields that offer undergraduate and graduate curricula. The roots of the field can be traced to Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes’ message, however, seems to have been utterly ignored by the social science. William Riker’s second launch of “Hobbesian advice”, in 1950’s and 60’s, proved more successful and put the field of formal theory on the map of political science. Yet, the very existence of the formal theory field can be seen as the failure of both Hobbes and Riker. There seems to be a continuing need for teaching social scientists why they should construct a proper science and how they should do it. This paper is an attempt to meet this need. I believe that the future science of politics will have to follow in the footsteps of Hobbes and Riker. And so will other social sciences. My point in the paper is not new; the way I make it, is.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/25477
ISSN: 0039424X
Appears in Collections:Studia Metodologiczne, 2019, nr 39

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SM39_MT_Cz¦Ö+Ť¦ç5.pdf694.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.