Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/4245
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrawczyk, Ewelina-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-30T09:52:38Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-30T09:52:38Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationSymbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium, 2011, nr XXI/2, s. 145-155pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7654-181-5-
dc.identifier.issn0302-7384-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/4245-
dc.descriptionRomani antiqui putabant litteras aedificiis similes esse. Nonnulli scriptores Latini tali modo metaphoras suas composuerunt, ut descriptio aedificii una cum descriptione operis poetici esset. Aeneis etiam effigiem suam continet, quae est ecphrasis portae templi Apollinis. In fabulam Aeneae Vergilius fabulam Daedali introduxit, quae diu doctis ad nihil pertinere videbatur. Falsissime quidem, quia non solum coniunctio fabularum exsistit, sed etiam multae sunt causae fabulae Daedali hoc loco imponendae. Imprimis caelamen monstrat multos casus ex vita Daedali et Aeneae similes fuisse, deinde ostendere Daedalum creatorem hibridarum esse videtur. Aeneis etiam hibrida est, quia constat ex duabus partibus, quae sunt, ut ita dicam, „pars Odysseica” et „pars Iliadica”. Utri (Daedalus Vergiliusque scilicet) sunt ergo creatores hibridarum. Maximi momenti est quaestio: quis dicit “miserum!” in hac parte poematis? Auctrix commentationis censet illum clamantem Vergilium esse, quia poeta constructorem „alter ego” suum esse credebat. Auctrix scripsit etiam imaginem illam, in qua caelata est fabula de Minotauro sine Theseo, viam esse pietatis Aeneae minuendae. Scripsit verba illa quoque opinionem Vergilii de natura poesis et vocem Augusti absconditam esse.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractVergil described his opus magnum, Aeneis, within the poem itself - as a temple’s door ecphrasis. By introducing Daedalus’ narrative into the main narrative, he set a bunch of signs of identity, both biographical and textual, between himself and the ancient inventor, in order to show the analogous identity between Aeneis and Daedalus’ work, the double labyrinth. By that he managed to highlight the hybrid nature of Aeneis itself and also, through some textual omissions, to depict Roman superhero-to-be, Aeneas, as a traitor. Vergil also made this ecphrasis both poet’s statement about boundaries of making poetry and a masterpiece of Augustan propaganda.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Naukpl_PL
dc.subjectAeneispl_PL
dc.subjectarchitecturepl_PL
dc.subjectAugustuspl_PL
dc.subjectDaedaluspl_PL
dc.subjectLabyrinthpl_PL
dc.subjectMetatextpl_PL
dc.subjectVergiliuspl_PL
dc.titleWergiliusz jako twórca labiryntupl_PL
dc.title.alternativeVergil as a creator of labyrinthpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeVergilius labyrinthi inventorpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium, 2011, nr XXI/2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Krawczyk_Symbolae_Philologorum_Posnaniensium_XXI_2.pdf177.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.