Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Authors: Bludnik, Izabela
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
Citation: Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 71, 2009, z. 3, s. 95-110
Abstract: In the face of a huge diversity of opinions among contemporary researchers when it comes to Keynesian thought, and recent permeation of strong neo-liberal concepts, such notions as “Keynesian unemployment” or “Keynesian policy” do not carry any specific, concrete meaning any longer. New Keynesian theories offer various definitions of unemployment and advise on economic policies, while many New Keynesian models postulate the supremacy of the voluntary rather than involuntary unemployment. What is more, those constructions which underlie involuntary unemployment question long-term efficiency of demand policy. Examples of modern Keynesian constructions referring to a broad neoclassical perspective concerning the unemployment phenomenon include search theoretic models on the labour market, implicit contracts, NAIRU and hysteresis, or the New Keynesian Phillips Curve.
ISSN: 0035-9629
Appears in Collections:Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 2009, nr 3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
08_Izabela_Bludnik_Bezrobocie keynesowskie_95-110.pdf501.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.