Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/4611
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBludnik, Izabela-
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-15T14:04:38Z-
dc.date.available2013-02-15T14:04:38Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationRuch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 71, 2009, z. 3, s. 95-110pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0035-9629-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/4611-
dc.description.abstractIn the face of a huge diversity of opinions among contemporary researchers when it comes to Keynesian thought, and recent permeation of strong neo-liberal concepts, such notions as “Keynesian unemployment” or “Keynesian policy” do not carry any specific, concrete meaning any longer. New Keynesian theories offer various definitions of unemployment and advise on economic policies, while many New Keynesian models postulate the supremacy of the voluntary rather than involuntary unemployment. What is more, those constructions which underlie involuntary unemployment question long-term efficiency of demand policy. Examples of modern Keynesian constructions referring to a broad neoclassical perspective concerning the unemployment phenomenon include search theoretic models on the labour market, implicit contracts, NAIRU and hysteresis, or the New Keynesian Phillips Curve.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydział Prawa i Administracji UAMpl_PL
dc.titleBEZROBOCIE KEYNESOWSKIEpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeKEYNESIAN UNEMPLOYMENTpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 2009, nr 3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
08_Izabela_Bludnik_Bezrobocie keynesowskie_95-110.pdf501.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.