Fata morgana‘s van de auteursintentie: Intentieprocessen als valkuil voor biografisch en teksteditorisch onderzoek
Loading...
Date
2013
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of Dutch and South African Studies, Faculty of English
Title alternative
Abstract
The notion “author’s intention” is nothing less than a booby trap. Intention counts
as a diffuse concept for literary research. In editorial theory and the practical application
of it, scholars use concepts such as “intended meaning” and “authorial intention” in order to legitimize certain decisions concerning the choice of the text version and the determination of variants respectively typographical errors. Contemporary research on
text editing distinguishes between “authorial will” and “authorial intention” (Mathijsen 1995: 141-142). Not the (testamentary) will of the author will be decisive in order to edit or interpret a certain text (version): the focus lies on what the author has “intended.”
This differentiation between “will” (a legal concept) and “intention” (a psychological category) is clear. Nevertheless, it has been neglected regularly by biographers (of a more
“hagiographic” and psychologizing kind). In this view, biographical and editorial research, and even literary history show dubious similarities. These research disciplines pretend to be able to know and study intentions and opinions of an author. Notwithstanding these
similarities and points of view, biographers almost never make use of the results of text genetics. For a scholarly discipline, it is at least remarkable that some biographers and editors rely on hypotheses and speculations in order to express textual decisions.
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
authorial intention, editorial theory, intentional fallacy, literary biography, literary historiography;, genetic criticism
Citation
Werkwinkel vol. 8(1), 2013, pp. 29-43
Seria
ISBN
ISSN
1896-3307