Seria "Polemika Krytycznoliteracka w Polsce"
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Seria "Polemika Krytycznoliteracka w Polsce" by Author "Budrewicz, Tadeusz"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Estetyka „zdrowego rozsądku”?(Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk, 2020) Budrewicz, Tadeusz; Okulicz-Kozaryn, Radosław; Panek, SylwiaThe study discusses the polemic over the criteria and nature of realism in art. In 1885 Bolesław Prus criticized the means of determining values in art based on the categories of ideas because it defies common sense. Wiktor Gomulicki in turn, refuted the cognitive bases of realism. In this context, both sides advanced arguments for and against the concept of the ideal in art – taking as their palette of theories that of the aesthetic according to Hippolyte Taine and Eugène Véron. The brouhaha of 1885 saw a climax of polemics and the cut and thrust of opinions that concerned naturalism in literature, the historic in painting, painterly impressionism as well as that of monumental and allegoric art. The canvas upon which the war of words was waged concerned writers and painters grouped around the weekly Wędrowiec who campaigned for their manifesto, the polemic between Stanisław Witkiewicz and Henryk Struve on the meaning of colour and light in painting and the nation-wide discussion that ensued from the competition for a monument to the Polish bard Adam Mickiewicz. The most significant voices of polemic were published in the Warsaw press of the time and moreover, the echo of positions taken resounded throughout the breadth and width of Poland. Casting a glance as it were back to the polemic of 1885 affords one the opportunity to deepen and broaden discussion of what may be said to be a milestone in anti-positivist movements in the related arts of that period.Item Spory wokół Romantyzmu i jego skutków Franciszka Krupińskiego(2018) Budrewicz, Tadeusz; Panek, SylwiaItem W sprawie przełomu pozytywistycznego. Spory krytyczne wokół Zarysu literatury polskiej z ostatnich lat szesnastu Piotra Chmielowskiego(Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk, 2015) Budrewicz, Tadeusz; Sobieraj, Tomasz; Panek, SylwiaThe 5th volume of the series Polemika Krytycznoliteracka w Polsce (“Critical Literary Argument in Poland”) deals with the nationwide critical dispute over the famous study by Piotr Chmielowski entitled Zarys literatury polskiej z ostatnich lat szesnastu, which was published in 1881. Its author, one of the most prominent Polish positivist literary critics, focused on the so-called positivistic turn that occurred after the collapse of the January Uprising in 1864. Chmielowski’s thesis caused a lot of controversy among literary critics and publicists. The author was accused of a bias against ideological opponents. The sharp dispute included many authors: some belonged to the liberal and positivistic group, whereas others represented conservative views. The former group included Aleksander Świętochowski, Józef Kotarbiński, Antoni Gustaw Bem, Teodor Tomasz Jeż; among the latter there were Adam Goraj, Ludwik Dębicki, Kazimierz Waliszewski. The dispute over Chmielowski’s book was crucial for the history of Polish literature in the second half of the 19th century. It also contributed to ideological and political discussion among the Polish intelligentsia.