Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/11482
Title: Czy pragmatyka jest u Kelsena możliwa?
Other Titles: Is Pragmatics in Kelsen’s Legal Philosophy possible?
Authors: Zalewska, Monika
Keywords: Hans Kelsen
Pure Theory of Law
Allgemeine Theorie der Normen
legal theory
pragmatics
normativism
imputation
basic norm
ought
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii
Citation: Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, Tom 2, 2013, Nr 2, s. 169-180.
Abstract: The main goal of Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law is to build a science of law. Kelsen is looking for a valid conditions of legal science and find them in neokantian philosophy. However, in the last phase when he turns into linguistic paradigm, he can’t explain science of law through neokantian terms anymore. In this case the question arises, how to recognize law from other linguistic expressions. Normally one could recall context of such expression (pragmatical context). In Kelsen’s case this is impossible as he distinguishes between is and ought and postulates that we should study law only on ought sphere. Despite this I will try to demonstrate that the pragmatics is possible in Pure Theory of Law by transforming previous neokantian categories into pragmatic ones.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/11482
DOI: 10.14746/fped.2013.2.2.21
ISBN: 978-83-7092-158-3
ISSN: 2299-1875
Appears in Collections:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2013, Tom 2 Nr 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
09-Monika Zalewska.pdf662.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons