Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/12566
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKubanek, Anita-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-20T08:05:12Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-20T08:05:12Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-18-
dc.identifier.citationPrzegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza, 2012, nr 1, s. 175-189pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2083-9782-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/12566-
dc.description.abstractState bodies have a right to resort to state compulsion, i.e. to a group of compulsion means which are an attribute of the state only. One of the most severe forms of state compulsion is direct compulsion which is applied predominantly by public officials in order to protect the rights and liberty of an individual and to ensure public safety. These means are designed to force a person to subordination to the commands based on law, which may entail the use of physical force. The purpose of this paper is to present the procedure and rules of using direct compulsion means and to discuss the level of legal interference in the individual’s rights and liberty.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherEuropejskie Stowarzyszenie Studentów Prawa ELSA Poznańpl_PL
dc.titleLegalność stosowania środków przymusu bezpośredniego w kontekście gwarancji konstytucyjnych Studium proceduralno-prawnepl_PL
dc.title.alternativeLegality of the application of direct means of compulsion in the context of constitutional guarantees – a legal procedural studypl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, vol. 1, 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
14. Kubanek.pdf109.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons