Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/13321
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRudzis, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-22T07:35:13Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-22T07:35:13Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-
dc.identifier.citationRight to property - is it really inviolable? Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, Special Edition, 2014, pp. 146-151.pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2083-9782-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/13321-
dc.description.abstractThe study aims at an evaluation of the pet ownership in the Russian civil law system. The author analyse that particular example of ownership, its subject and object with a special emphasis on the withdrawn.pl_PL
dc.publisherEuropejskie Stowarzyszenie Studentów Prawa ELSA Poznańpl_PL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl_PL
dc.subjectpet ownershippl_PL
dc.subjectcivil lawpl_PL
dc.subjectwithdrawnpl_PL
dc.titleПраво собственности на домашних животныхpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeThe pet ownershippl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, vol. 4, 2014

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
14 Rudzis..pdf204.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.