Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Heurystyka strachu. Czy ambiwalencja lęku może być dla nas pouczająca?
Other Titles: The Heuristics of Fear: Can the Ambivalence of Fear Teach Us Anything?
Authors: Tibaldeo, Roberto Franzini
Editors: Nowak, Ewa
Translator: Huk, Marta Zuzanna
Keywords: Responsibility
heuristics of fear
technological risks
Hans Jonas
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM
Citation: Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2015, Tom 4, Nr 1, pp. 68-86.
Abstract: The paper assumes that fear presents a certain degree of ambivalence. To say it with Hans Jonas (1903-1993), fear is not only a negative emotion, but may teach us something very important: we recognize what is relevant when we perceive that it is at stake. Under this respect, fear may be assumed as a guide to responsibility, a virtue that is becoming increasingly important, because of the role played by human technology in the current ecological crisis. Secondly, fear and responsibility concern both dimensions of human action: private-individual and publiccollective. What the ‘heuristics of fear’ teaches us, is to become aware of a deeper ambivalence, namely the one which characterizes as such human freedom, which may aim to good or bad, to self-preservation or self-destruction. Any public discussion concerning political or economic issues related with human action (at an individual or collective level) ought not to leave this essential idea out of consideration.
DOI: 10.14746/fped.2015.4.1.4
ISSN: 2299-1875
Appears in Collections:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2015, Tom 4, Nr 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
04-Roberto_Tibaldeo.pdf637.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons