Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/166
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuban, Dmitry A.-
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-25T07:18:05Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-25T07:18:05Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationGeologos vo. 15 (2), 2009, pp. 129-132.pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1426-8981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/166-
dc.description.abstractSurvival of Pleistocene megafauna after the hypothesized impact of a bolide during the latest Pleistocene seems to be partly island-centered, whereas that the survival of dinosaurs and ammonites after the comparable catastrophe at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary seems to have occurred in a fairly haphazard way within the areas affected by the impact. This poses some new questions about the possible mechanism behind the end-Pleistocene extinction, although it does not disprove an impact as a plausible cause.pl_PL
dc.publisherBogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowepl_PL
dc.subjectImpactpl_PL
dc.subjectSurvivalpl_PL
dc.subjectMegafaunapl_PL
dc.subjectPleistocenepl_PL
dc.subjectCretaceous/Tertiary boundarypl_PL
dc.titleThe survival of megafauna after the end-Pleistocene impact: a lesson from the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundarypl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Geologos, 2009, 15, 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Geologos_15_2_Ruban.pdf140.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.