Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/25266
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMotte, André-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16T10:18:14Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-16T10:18:14Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPeitho. Examina Antiqua, nr 1(10), 2019, s. 153-170pl
dc.identifier.issn2082–7539-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/25266-
dc.description.abstractAlthough Bertrand Russell is probably most famous for his “logi­cal atomism,” it is his ethical thought that this article will attempt to contrast with the ethics of the founder of the ancient atomism: Democritus of Abdera. Russell has himself suggested certain affinity here. More concerned with practice than theory, both philosophers advocate a certain teleological and eudemonistic morality; furthermore, they both adopt the same approaches to various related topics. Yet, what had only been outlined by Democritus was extensively developed by Russell. Hence, it is worth examining whether there is any deeper common ground between the two: can Russell’s clarity throw some light on Democritus’ fragments?pl
dc.language.isoitapl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAMpl
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl
dc.subjectDemocrituspl
dc.subjectBertrand Russellpl
dc.subjectethicspl
dc.subjecteudaimonismpl
dc.subjecteuthymiapl
dc.subjectphronesispl
dc.subjectpractical wisdompl
dc.titleFrom Democritus to Bertrand Russell and Backpl
dc.typeArtykułpl
dc.identifier.doi10.14746/pea.2019.1.8-
Appears in Collections:Peitho. Examina Antiqua, nr 1(10), 2019

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Peitho 10 2019 08_MOTTE.pdf612.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons