Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/25616
Title: Lügenbegriffe und Lügenpraxis in der Moderne
Other Titles: Concepts of lies and lie practices in the modern era
Authors: Dietzsch, Steffen
Keywords: lie
double nature
modernity
Plato
Kant
Nietzsche
Scheler
Jankélévitch
politics
love
ressentiment
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM
Citation: Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2018/2019, Tom 7, Nr 2 - Tom 8, Nr 1, s. 38-57
Abstract: Lies occupy a surprisingly favorable place within our daily life. As the Polish aphorist Stanisław Jerzy Lec once remarked: if you want to see the lie you need to face the obvious truth. With lies, we do not simply stigmatize the dark part or the “backside” of the humankind. To lie, meaning the ability to deceive, with or without words, even to deceive with the truth (for example in statistics), is one of the intellectual modalities of human existence, as well as an expression of misery. This leads to the paradox: One cannot live with lies or, at the same time, live without them. Lies thus reveal their double nature; they attempt to maintain vivid things, just as they generally tend to destroy them. This double nature of lies makes it impossible to condemn them by means of “ethical conviction”, as Max Weber would put it, or with the words of another famous French philosopher of our present time, Vladimir Jankélévitch, who says that consciousness is already provided with an inner disposi-tion to lie, as a litmus test of its noble and mean sides.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/25616
DOI: 10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.3
ISSN: 2299-1875
Appears in Collections:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2018/2019, Tom 7, Nr 2 - Tom 8 Nr 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
03-Dietzsch-niem.pdf355.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons