Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/3829
Title: „Gazeta Wyborcza” i „Rzeczpospolita” wobec wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 11 maja 2007 r. w sprawie ustawy lustracyjnej (analiza porównawcza)
Other Titles: “Gazeta Wyborcza” and “Rzeczpospolita” Towards the Sentence of the Constitutional Tribunal of May 11, 2007 on the Lustration Bill (Comparative Analysis)
Authors: Jęczmionka, Paulina
Keywords: gazeta wyborcza
rzeczpospolita
trybunał
konstytucja
lustracja
prasa
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNPiD UAM, Poznań
Citation: Refleksje, nr 3, wiosna-lato 2011, s. 157-183.
Abstract: The article deals with a problem of vetting in the press discourse taken “Gazeta Wyborcza” and “Rzeczpospolita” as an example. There is an attempt to present oppositional attitudes of both titles against each other. All the articles about a vetting problem a week before and after May 11, 2007 were analyzed. Some questions had also been asked. Was the sentence similarly commented by both newspapers and Why was it commented in a particular way? After the analysis, the hypothesis was confirmed. That is, the comments on the sentence were opposite and unbalanced. It was because of different newspapers’ programme lines. It was ascertained that “Gazeta Wyborcza” was against the vetting whereas “Rzeczpospolita” supported it.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/3829
ISSN: 2081-8270
Appears in Collections:Refleksje, nr 3, wiosna-lato 2011

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jeczmionka.pdf2.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.