Input or intimacy
Loading...
Date
2014-10
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Zakład Filologii Angielskiej Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Kaliszu
Title alternative
Abstract
According to the critical period hypothesis, the earlier the acquisition of a second
language starts, the better. Owing to the plasticity of the brain, up until a certain age
a second language can be acquired successfully according to this view. Early second language learners are commonly said to have an advantage over later ones especially in phonetic/phonological acquisition. Native-like pronunciation is said to be
most likely to be achieved by young learners. However, there is evidence of accent-free speech in second languages learnt after puberty as well. Occasionally, on the
other hand, a nonnative accent may appear even in early second (or third) language
acquisition. Cross-linguistic influences are natural in multilingual development, and
we would expect the dominant language to have an impact on the weaker one(s).
The dominant language is usually the one that provides the largest amount of input
for the child. But is it always the amount that counts? Perhaps sometimes other factors, such as emotions, come into play? In this paper, data obtained from an English-
Persian-Hungarian trilingual pair of siblings (under age 4 and 3 respectively) is analyzed, with a special focus on cross-linguistic influences at the phonetic/phonological levels. It will be shown that beyond the amount of input there are more important factors that trigger interference in multilingual development
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
general language effort, input, emotionality, multilingual acquisition
Citation
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp.485-506