Types of lexical complexity in English: Syntactic categories and the lexicon

dc.contributor.author	Anderson, John
dc.date.accessioned	2017-08-25T08:29:55Z
dc.date.available	2017-08-25T08:29:55Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.description.abstract	This study focuses on minimal (non-compound, non-phrasal) signs that are nevertheless internally complex in their syntactic categorization. Sometimes this is signalled by morphology – affixation or internal modification. But there are also conversions. In terms of categorial structure, we can distinguish between absorptions, where the source of the base is associated with a distinct category, and incorporation, where the base is categorially constant. Incorporation is thus typically reflected in inflectional morphology. Absorption may be associated with morphological change or conversion – with retention of the base in a different categorization. But categorial complexity may be nonderived, covert: the categorial complexity of an item is evident only in its syntax and semantics.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.citation	Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, vol. 47.4 (2012), pp. 3-51	pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn	0081-6272
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10593/19163
dc.language.iso	eng	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Adam Mickiewicz University	pl_PL
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	pl_PL
dc.title	Types of lexical complexity in English: Syntactic categories and the lexicon	pl_PL
dc.type	Artykuł	pl_PL

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:: [Studia Anglica Posnaniensia] Types of Lexical Complexity in English Syntactic Categories and the Lexicon.pdf
Size:: 331.03 KB
Format:: Adobe Portable Document Format

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1