Aristotle’s Zeno. How the History of Philosophy is Intertwined with Contemporary Philosophy

Abstract

Hermeneutical scholars doubt whether many past authors really exist-ed. They are only a sort of construction built with the passing of time. Indeed, Zeno of Elea, for instance, was real, and historians attempted to establish what he wrote and intended to say. Our most important source for Zeno is Aristotle. Zeno’s paradoxes deeply influenced the latter’s Physics. Is Aristotle’s physics relevant to us? Yes, because philosophi-cal problems are too complex not to be considered in their historical development as well. In reading Zeno and Aristotle, we can see physi-cal problems from a completely different perspective and learn a lot. In other terms, the historical Zeno is disorienting for us. On the other hand, Zeno’s historical legacy is extremely interesting for us. Indeed, we will see how Zeno’s and Aristotle’s reflections on continuum, extension, and movement could contribute to a better understanding of these notions in the contemporary debate.