Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa
| dc.contributor.author | Marian Andrzej Wesoły | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-02T09:44:27Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The basis of Aristotle’s arguments about truth and falsity is formulated syntactically according to the distinctions of ‘to be’ as the predicative affirmation - composition and, correspondingly, ‘not to be’ as negation – separation. As the nominal defining characteristic of falsity is contradiction, so of truth is non-contradiction. The expression of truth or falsity in the declarative sentence of affirmation or negation is a function of thinking as a human cognitive disposition under the semantic figures of categorical predication. In addition, we cite Aristotle’s more important texts on the true intellection of non-composites (indivisibles), the investigation of truth and probability, the diagnosis of falsehood, the truthfulness and lying. Finally, a mention of modern adaptations of Aristotle’s concept of truth. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Wesoły, M. A. (2021) “Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa”, Peitho. Examina Antiqua, 12(1), pp. 171–196. doi: 10.14746/10.14746/pea.2021.1.9. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.14746/10.14746/pea.2021.1.9 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10593/28567 | |
| dc.language.iso | pl | |
| dc.publisher | Wydział Filozoficzny UAM | |
| dc.subject | Aristotle | |
| dc.subject | Being – Not-Being | |
| dc.subject | Categorical predication | |
| dc.subject | Falsity as Contradiction | |
| dc.subject | Truth as non-contradiction | |
| dc.subject | Philosophy as investigation of truth | |
| dc.subject | Truthfulness and Lying | |
| dc.title | Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa | |
| dc.title.alternative | Being – Not-Being, Truth – Falsehood in Aristotle’s View | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
