Kariera drapieżnych czasopism – przypadek Anny O. Szust
| dc.contributor.author | Kulczycki, Emanuel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-04T11:45:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-09-04T11:45:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article discusses the challenges and problems caused by predatory journals in scholarly communication. By focusing on the editorial practices, I describe the case of Dr. Anna Fraud (Anna O. Szust in Polish): a bogus scientist created by four Polish scholars. Dr. Fraud became a member of editorial boards in over 40 scientific journals although she is a fake person and, obviously has no experience in journal editing. The present paper aims to show that scientist always have to care about a quality control and a peer review system. The article concludes with a presentation of the ‘Think. Check. Submit’ Initiative which provides useful and helpful tools for analysing journals by potential contributors. | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.citation | Kulczycki, E. (2017). Kariera drapieżnych czasopism – przypadek Anny O. Szust. Nauka 3/2017. ss. 71–83. | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1231-8515 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10593/19269 | |
| dc.language.iso | pol | pl_PL |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Czasopisma drapieżne | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Predatory Journals | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Anna Olga Szust | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Dr. Fraud | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Lista Bealla | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Beall’s List | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Kariera drapieżnych czasopism – przypadek Anny O. Szust | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Artykuł | pl_PL |