„Paradoks kłamcy" w perspektywie hermeneutycznej
Loading...
Date
2009
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM
Title alternative
"The liar's paradox" from a hermeneutical prospect
Abstract
The aim of my article is to present "the liar's paradox" from a non empirical perspective of the language.
The paradox may be as though "resolved" (but in just another way then it is done within the
semantics view by Tarski), among other things, thanks to Lacan's psychoanalysis. Namely "the liar's
paradox" which is connected with a division between a statement and an enunciation is treated
by Lacan as accompanying a subject during his (her) process of gaining a certainty about himself
(herself) and about the world and as impossible to overcome in a traditional way. The problem of
"liar's paradox" mayby merely suppressed. An attempt of suppressing of a nonsense took place,
according to Lacan and Foucault, within the area of "Meditations" by Descartes and maybe more
in theirs modern interpretations. The non empirical proposition of an elimination "the liar's paradox"
consists in an acceptance of the madness (as defined by Foucault) and at the same time in
staying in a surface of some texts. This strategy does not allow to divide talking in two: the language
and the meta-language. Moreover 1 try to discuss with Żiżek concept concerning with an incomprehension
this problem (mainly the usage of the meta-language) by Derrida.
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
Citation
Przestrzenie Teorii, nr 11, 2009, s. 155-164.
ISBN
978-83-232-1986-6