GŁÓWNE NURTY W TEORII KAPITAŁU

dc.contributor.authorMarchewka, Kamilla
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-14T11:51:04Z
dc.date.available2013-03-14T11:51:04Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.description.abstractThe history of capital theory has been of continuous debate. Many economists have tried to give any specific simple interpretation of capital and many of them failed. In literature we can find also a lot o f explanations of other definitions connected directly with the term o f capital - created sometimes in specific situations as particular theory. Keeping in mind the sentence written in 1975 by C. J. Bliss that „when economists reach agreement on the theory of capital they will shortly reach agreement on everything”, in this article the Author doesn’t want to estimate or find the best interpretation of capital. She would rather like to present three main trends (directions) which we can find studying historic and more contemporary economic literature.pl_PL
dc.identifier.citationRuch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 62, 2000, z. 3, s. 105-120pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0035-9629
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/5283
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydział Prawa i Administracji UAMpl_PL
dc.titleGŁÓWNE NURTY W TEORII KAPITAŁUpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeMAIN TRENDS IN CAPITAL THEORYpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
07_Kamilla_Marchewka_Główne nurty w teorii kapitału_105-120.pdf
Size:
541 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.49 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego