„Najistotniejsza kwestia, jaka może być”. Odpowiedź na artykuł E.A.J. Honigmanna
| dc.contributor.author | Hammerschmidt-Hummel, Hildegard | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kowalska, Karolina (Tł.) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-14T20:55:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-02-14T20:55:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This text is a reply to E.A.J. Honigmann and presents another point of view on Shakespeare’s Catholicism. H. Hammerschmidt-Hummel defends her thesis and tries to convince that her book is based on reliable studies and historical sources. She proves that a secret Catholic code in his plays is the most important key to understanding his whole output. Her arguments are based on two evidences: the known or presumed “Catholic sympathies” of the dramatist’s family, friends and patrons and the “Catholic attitudes” embedded in the plays. | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.citation | Przestrzenie Teorii, nr 16, 2011, str. 307-317 | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-232-2337-5 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1644-6763 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10593/2101 | |
| dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM w Poznaniu | pl_PL |
| dc.title | „Najistotniejsza kwestia, jaka może być”. Odpowiedź na artykuł E.A.J. Honigmanna | pl_PL |
| dc.title.alternative | ”The most important subject that can possibly be”. A response to E.A.J. Honigmann’s article | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Artykuł | pl_PL |