Rhétorique des figures et rhétorique des conflits; entre stylistique et argumentation

dc.contributor.author	Domańska-Gruszka, Jolanta
dc.date.accessioned	2012-08-13T08:20:57Z
dc.date.available	2012-08-13T08:20:57Z
dc.date.issued	2007
dc.description.abstract	The term of rhetoric has known several senses since its foundation as techne of persuasion by Aristote. This paper presents the historical reasons of limitation of the first rhetorical project into the scholar treaties in 17th-19th centuries. The next question is to explain the revival of rhetorical tradition with Chaim Perelman Olbrechts-Tyteca Traité de l'argumentation focused on the theory of argumentation and the French "nouvelle critique" focused on linguistics and stylistics. The key-term for both linguistic and philosophic approach of new rhetoric is a figure of speech. The author tries to find out if the modem reunified vision of rhetoric is possible and suitable.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.citation	Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 2007, vol. 34, pp. 43-52	pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn	0137-2475
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10593/3045
dc.language.iso	fr	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM	pl_PL
dc.subject	Rhetoric	pl_PL
dc.subject	Aristote	pl_PL
dc.subject	Traité de l'argumentation	pl_PL
dc.subject	Perelman Chaim	pl_PL
dc.subject	Olbrechts-Tyteca Lucie	pl_PL
dc.title	Rhétorique des figures et rhétorique des conflits; entre stylistique et argumentation	pl_PL
dc.title.alternative	Rhetoric of figures and rhetoric of conflicts; between stylistics and argumentation	pl_PL
dc.type	Artykuł	pl_PL

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:: 04_J_Domanska_Gruszka_Rhetorique_des_figures_et_rhetorique_des_conflits_43-52.PDF
Size:: 266.21 KB
Format:: Adobe Portable Document Format

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1