PRYWATYZACJA I DEREGULACJA W SFERZE INFRASTRUKTURY
Loading...
Date
2000
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
Title alternative
PRIVATISATION AND DEREGULATION IN THE SPHERE OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Abstract
The Author is occupied with motivations and possibilities of changes concerning functioning
of infra-structural components of national economy. He stresses the need for non ideological approach
to privatisation problems; in case of infra-structural links of the economy the choice consists
not in opposing a good market to a „bad State” but it is often reduced to declare itself for a deceptive market, anyway, or for equally deceptive State. When making a choice between less or more
market solutions one can not make no mention of extra-economic circumstances or of premises of
social order. Next the Author states that all postulates relating to privatisation and deregulation
affect mainly the sphere of exploitation of the infrastructure and to a less extent - the infrastructure
itself. For instance, the idea, otherwise proper, of deregulation of the transportation is not to
be automatically identified with a postulate to abandon public regulation of developing the transportation
infrastructure. So, a deregulation of infra-structural components of the economy does
mean to a great measure a transition to other form of regulation; it is important on this opportunity
to separate the States’ role as a regulator from possible assuming by this State of a role of the
owner. Finally, the Author indicates a necessity of distinguishing a regulation aimed at establishing
who and what are supposed to be done (the so-called structural regulation resolving itself
into a reglamentation) from a regulation which aims at shaping the functioning of firms (the
so-called regulation of the behaviour). The first one should be restricted to a maximum whereas
the second one - consolidated and developed.
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 62, 2000, z. 1, s. 71-90