Własność — zawłaszczanie czy korzystanie?
Loading...
Date
1988
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
Title alternative
Property — appropriation or use?
Abstract
One of basic weaknesses of a great part of conceptions of property formulated
in the writings is the inability to define specific economic contents of property.
Among others, such is the case of defining property as "appropriation". Those definitions
are burdened with "idem per idem" error or they reduce property to the
productive labour process. An example of logical and theoretical difficulties resulting
from defining property as "appropriation" is the conception of a Soviet
economist, J. Kronrod.
In another group of definitions appropriation appears as a synonym of "use",
which in the author's opinion is the fullest expression of property in the economic
sense. However, the use of a different term makes the said synonymity hard to
notice. The conception of property defined as "use" may also include the analysis
of relationships of junction between means of production and labour, treated by
some authors as "definiens" of property. However, in such a case it is necessary to
clear the category of junction between means of production and labour of formal-
-legal and vague formulations, typical for most of current conceptions.
Description
Sponsor
Digitalizacja i deponowanie archiwalnych zeszytów RPEiS sfinansowane przez MNiSW w ramach realizacji umowy nr 541/P-DUN/2016
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 50, 1988, z. 3, s. 245-263