Istota i znaczenie (funkcje) zasad postępowania sądowoadministracyjnego

dc.contributor.authorWiktorowska, Aleksandra
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-23T07:28:53Z
dc.date.available2017-02-23T07:28:53Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThere are two main platforms on which the role and importance of the principles of procedural law can be observed. One concerns the basic functions played by these principles, i.e. the function that orders the process, the function that shapes the process model, the interpretative function and the cognitive function. The other platform concerns the reference sphere i.e. a sphere to which these principles are or may be of importance owing to the functions they have. Thus it comprises the sphere of making and enforcing law and its criticism, the law teaching and researching sphere, the practical sphere, the political-ideological sphere and last but not least the sphere of codifi ed and non-codifi ed law. This division however is not absolute. There exists, for example, convergence between the sphere of law enforcement and law practice as well as between the sphere of law criticism and law teaching or researching. A similar convergence may be observed between the law making and the political-ideological spheres. The two platforms cross over and create meeting points in which individual functions of principles in relevant reference spheres may be marked. At the law-making stage, the ordering function harmonises legal solutions adopted in a legislative act whereas at the law-enforcement stage it facilitates construction of a legal text. The shaping of a model of proceedings in administrative courts by principles means that these principles make it possible to determine the structure of institutions and procedural solutions in proceedings before administrative courts, while the interpretative function occurs only in the sphere of law enforcement and criticism. The cognitive function is mainly signifi cant for the law teaching and researching sphere, but also for the law practice, including criticism.pl_PL
dc.description.articlenumber2pl_PL
dc.description.journaltitleStudia Prawa Publicznegopl_PL
dc.description.number14pl_PL
dc.description.pageof31pl_PL
dc.description.pageto47pl_PL
dc.description.tome2pl_PL
dc.identifier.citationStudia Prawa Publicznego, 2016, Nr 14, s. 31-47.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14746/stpp.2016.2.14.2
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-232-3093-9
dc.identifier.issn2300-3936
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/17475
dc.language.isopolpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe UAMpl_PL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl_PL
dc.subjectlegal principle pl_PL
dc.subjectlaw making pl_PL
dc.subjectlaw enforcementpl_PL
dc.subjectconstruction/interpretation of lawpl_PL
dc.subjectcodified law non-codified lawpl_PL
dc.titleIstota i znaczenie (funkcje) zasad postępowania sądowoadministracyjnegopl_PL
dc.title.alternativeThe essence and meaning of the administrative court proceedingpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SPP_2_14_2016_Aleksandra_Wiktorowska.pdf
Size:
174.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego